Evidence before certainty

Factual scientific fields must resolve to reusable source IDs. The build checks source references and requires citations for reviewed claims. A reference entry is not a substitute for checking that it supports the claim.

Published accounts name and date the source check and the editorial review separately. Unresearched sections remain explicit. Citations, authorities, synonyms, assay values and distribution claims must never be invented.

Not yet researched: Psilocybia has not reviewed the field. No published evidence located: a documented search has not located evidence. Not applicable: the field does not apply.

Uncertain and disputed describe different limitations. Unavailable indicates evidence that cannot currently be reproduced or licensed. These states must not be treated as interchangeable.

Accounts are researched and written, then each populated claim is checked against its cited source, with the scope and limitations recorded. Publication requires named, dated approval tied to the exact content and cited references, and any change to either invalidates that approval. Review by the named editor is not independent peer review, and this reference does not claim it is.

Chemistry is presented as scientific literature, not expected effects. Species descriptions are not field-identification guidance.