An independent scientific referenceTaxonomy · Evidence · Context
PSILOCYBIAA monograph for the digital age.
Research edition Accounts distinguish source checks from human review. Research coverage is incomplete. Read our standards

01Overview

Source-checked

This account connects the 1995 name with later morphological, molecular and chemical studies. The extracted chemistry concerns cultivated research material. [index-fungorum-446057-2026] [borovicka-2008] [windsor-2026]

This is a scientific reference record, not field-identification guidance.

02Nomenclature

Accepted name
Psilocybe azurescens
Authority
Stamets & Gartz
Family
Agrocybaceae
Publication year
1995
Basionym
Not yet researched — verification required
Taxonomic status
accepted
MycoBank identifier
Not yet researched — verification required
Index Fungorum identifier
446057
Synonyms (0 recorded names)

No verified synonyms entered. This does not indicate that synonyms do not exist.

Nomenclatural sources: [index-fungorum-446057-2026] [borovicka-2011] [niskanen-2026]

Research completeness

taxonomy
Human reviewed — J Dale, 2026-09-29

Core name and selected treatment checked. Exhaustive synonymy and current MycoBank database verification remain pending.

overview
preliminary

Introduction to this scoped account.

description
preliminary

Selected primary descriptions or type observations checked. Not a comprehensive modern redescription.

ecology
preliminary

Published habitat context only; no exhaustive ecological synthesis.

distribution
preliminary

Source-backed locations only. No complete range assessment or occurrence dataset.

chemistry
preliminary

Selected studies only; further assay discovery and synthesis remain pending.

molecular
preliminary

Published sequence evidence only; no independent sequence analysis.

history
preliminary

Nomenclatural history only; broader historical synthesis remains pending.

conservation
not researched

Conservation assessments have not yet been researched.

03Taxonomic description

Taxonomic description. These characters are presented for scientific reference and are not intended as field-identification guidance.

Macroscopic characters

Source-checked

Borovička’s treatment records caps 3–6(–10) cm across, usually with a pointed umbo, and stems reaching 20 cm. A fibrous ring zone can occur on the upper stem. These are published taxonomic characters. [borovicka-2008]

Microscopic characters

Source-checked

The same treatment gives ellipsoid spores measuring (11.0–)12.0–13.5(–14.8) × (6.8–)7.2–7.7(–8.0) µm. The bracketed endpoints represent the 5th and 95th percentiles, as defined in the methods. [borovicka-2008]

04Distribution and ecology

Source-checked

Published molecular material includes Oregon voucher PRM 901020 and an East San Francisco Bay collection in the genome study. These records are not a complete range map; laboratory material in the chemistry study adds no wild locality. [borovicka-2011] [bollinger-2025] [windsor-2026]

Known range
An American species, introduced to Europe, where it was first reported from a natural habitat in Germany
Countries with documented material
United States, Germany
Habitats
Not yet researched
Substrates
Not yet researched
Ecological associations
Not yet researched
Seasonality
Not yet researched

Ecological context

Source-checked

Index Fungorum records the type habitat as red-alder wood chips in Oregon. The later genome paper describes its California source material as soil beneath redwood leaf litter. These are separate collection contexts. [index-fungorum-446057-2026] [bollinger-2025]

Occurrence records

544 georeferenced records, shown as 217 distinct positions at this scale. Records carry 11 country codes, 4 of which rest on a single record. Full-precision records are available from the citable source dataset.

Recorded observations are not equivalent to true biological range. Absence of records does not demonstrate absence of a species.

Occurrence provenance & map methods
Licence / retrieval date
CC BY-NC 4.0 / 2026-09-15
Coordinate uncertainty
Reported for 489 of 544 plotted records. Median 27 km; 35 records at 30 m or finer; coarsest 2412 km. Points are plotted at source precision, so precision varies by orders of magnitude within this map.
Sensitive records
unreviewed
Countries with georeferenced records
US (502) · CA (17) · SE (8) · PT (5) · AT (3) · FI (3) · NL (2) · BR (1) · CH (1) · DE (1) · PL (1)

Points are plotted at source precision on an equirectangular projection. Two records falling on the same rendered pixel appear as one mark; the downloadable dataset is not reduced. Records published under names this reference has not reconciled, including synonyms, infraspecific taxa and sequence clusters, are excluded rather than reassigned.

05Chemistry

Measurements belong to studies, specimens and methods. A single concentration cannot stand in for a species.

Published assays · Measurements retain their original methodological context.
Study / yearMaterialMethodRecord
Development of Psilocybe Mushroom Species Reference Material—Cultivation Parameters and Chemical Profiles / 2026Freeze-dried mushroomsHPTLC with densitometric quantification at 273 nmDetails ↓
windsor-2026-azurescens-table-3 — specimen, methods & measurements
Source location
Table 3, azurescens row; Experimental: preparation, storage and HPTLC quantification
Verification
Source checked; see evidence trail
Measurement basis
dry mass
Specimen
Cultivated mushroom material; no per-sample voucher mapping extracted.
Material
Freeze-dried mushrooms
Sample size
12
Sample counting basis
N (Samples) = 12 as labelled in Table 3. Independent fruiting-body and collection counts are not specified there.
Provenance
Cultivated research material from the Nammex study; not a wild occurrence record.
Analytical method
HPTLC with densitometric quantification at 273 nm
Preparation
Freeze-dried and ground material; methanol/acetic acid extraction (95:5 v/v), sonication and centrifugation.
Storage
Sealed moisture-resistant bags at room temperature in darkness. Per-sample storage intervals are not supplied in the extracted table.
psilocybin
0.81–1.77 % (w/w) (range) — Low–high values, dry weight; Table 3.
psilocin
0.08–0.29 % (w/w) (range) — Low–high values, dry weight; Table 3.
baeocystin
not reported — No quantitative value in Table 3; qualitative chromatographic observations are not entered as concentrations.
norbaeocystin
not reported — No quantitative value in Table 3; qualitative chromatographic observations are not entered as concentrations.
aeruginascin
not reported — No quantitative value in Table 3; qualitative chromatographic observations are not entered as concentrations.

Ranges retain the source’s percent dry weight (w/w), without conversion. Table 3 also reports means ± SD: psilocybin 1.33 ± 0.325%; psilocin 0.20 ± 0.080%. These summarize this dataset only.

Read source record

Modern quantitative assays

Source-checked

Psilocybin and psilocin were quantified by HPTLC densitometry at 273 nm. Other alkaloids were examined qualitatively, without concentration values in Table 3. [windsor-2026]

Evidence assessment

Source-checked

One HPTLC study is extracted. It reports concentrations as percent dry weight and counts 12 samples; these are not assumed to be 12 independent wild collections. [windsor-2026]

Assessments depend on material, preparation, storage, sampling and analytical methods. Measurements are literature records, not predictions of effects.

How chemistry records are structured ↗

06Molecular evidence

Source-checked

Table 1 of the 2011 study links PRM 901020 to ITS GU565173, LSU GU565166 and EF1α GU565159. The later genome paper reports GCA_040207365.1 and BioSample SAMN39911973. [borovicka-2011] [bollinger-2025]

07History

Source-checked

Index Fungorum cites the name in Integration 6: 21 (1995) and records the holotype as a Stamets collection of 21 November 1993 at WTU. The original 1995 publication has not been inspected for this account. [index-fungorum-446057-2026]

A place for the historical record

This account records the nomenclatural history checked so far. Broader historical research remains pending; interpretations must stay connected to their documentary sources.

Reading the scientific record ↗

08Conservation

Not yet researched

Conservation assessments have not yet been researched for this account.

Assessment status
Not yet researched
Assessment authority / year
Not verified / Not verified

Not researched by Psilocybia, not assessed by a conservation authority, and Least Concern are different states. None should be inferred from another.

09Images & specimens

No verified, licensed scientific images supplied

Space is reserved for field photographs, herbarium specimens, microscopy and historical plates, with source and licence metadata.

Photographs are not presented as sufficient for mushroom identification.

10References

  1. I.M. Bollinger; H. Singer; J. Jacobs; M. Tyler; K. Scott; C.S. Pauli; D.R. Miller; C. Barlow; A. Rockefeller; J.C. Slot; V. Angel-Mosti (2025). High-quality draft genomes of ecologically and geographically diverse Psilocybe species. Microbiology Resource Announcements 14(2), e00250-24. DOI: 10.1128/mra.00250-24 Source record ↗

    Source class: primary.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Bibliographic identity inspected; publication year is distinct from retrieval date.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Table 1 P. semilanceata column and data availability inspected. Issue year 2025; electronic publication was 27 December 2024. Accession copied from paper, assembly not independently reanalysed.

    • doi: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      DOI and title matched against the cited bibliographic record; not just resolver availability.

  2. Jan Borovička (2008). The wood-rotting bluing Psilocybe species in Central Europe — an identification key. Czech Mycology 60(2), 173–192. DOI: 10.33585/cmy.60202 Source record ↗

    Source class: primary.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      PDF, publisher page and Crossref agree on title, author, volume and pages. Citation follows the printed 2008 volume year. Publisher page reports actual release 27 February 2009; Crossref gives 27 February 2008. This discrepancy is retained, not resolved by assumption.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Full PDF inspected, especially key pp. 176–177 and treatments pp. 180, 183. Morphological observations are not a current field-identification guide. Species concepts predate the 2011 molecular revision.

    • doi: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      DOI, title, authors and journal matched to Crossref metadata and the publication.

  3. Jan Borovička; Machiel E. Noordeloos; Milan Gryndler; Miroslav Oborník (2011). Molecular phylogeny of Psilocybe cyanescens complex in Europe, with reference to the position of the secotioid Weraroa novae-zelandiae. Mycological Progress 10(2), 149–155. DOI: 10.1007/s11557-010-0684-3 Source record ↗

    Source class: primary.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Title, four authors, DOI and pages matched to Crossref. Issue year 2011; online publication 8 June 2010. Neither date is presented as a new 2026 revision.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Full PDF inspected: sampling limitation p. 150; Table 1 p. 151; results and rank changes pp. 152–153. Failed serbica paratype sequencing is retained. Database disagreement on arcana rank is recorded in the account.

    • doi: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      DOI, title, authors and journal matched to Crossref metadata and the publication.

  4. GBIF Secretariat (2026). Psilocybe azurescens — GBIF Backbone Taxonomy record 5242469; accessed 29 September 2026. . Source record ↗

    Source class: taxonomic database.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-29 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Backbone name record retrieved and confirmed by two independent routes: the strict name-match endpoint returned usageKey 5242469 as an EXACT, ACCEPTED species match, and the record endpoint was then fetched directly and agreed on name, rank and acceptance. The record places Psilocybe in Hymenogastraceae; that placement is not adopted here.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-29 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Backbone name record retrieved and confirmed by two independent routes: the strict name-match endpoint returned usageKey 5242469 as an EXACT, ACCEPTED species match, and the record endpoint was then fetched directly and agreed on name, rank and acceptance. The record places Psilocybe in Hymenogastraceae; that placement is not adopted here.

  5. GBIF.org (2026). GBIF Occurrence Download: georeferenced records for Psilocybe taxa (download 0000371-260915150036944). . DOI: 10.15468/dl.dhgzxa Source record ↗

    Source class: primary.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-29 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Download record retrieved from the GBIF API. Key 0000371-260915150036944, DOI 10.15468/dl.dhgzxa, status SUCCEEDED, created 2026-09-15, 31,439 records drawn from 294 datasets, SIMPLE_CSV format, licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode. The DOI and the record count were confirmed against the archive held locally rather than assumed from the filename.

    • doi: verified · 2026-09-29 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      DOI read from the download record returned by the GBIF API and matched to the download key of the archive used to generate the occurrence maps.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-29 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      The archive was read row by row to generate the published maps and the per-country counts. 31,208 rows carry usable coordinates and a taxonKey this reference maps to one of its own records; 231 rows fall under synonyms, infraspecific taxa or sequence clusters and are excluded rather than reassigned. Coordinate uncertainty is reported for about 90 per cent of rows, with a median near 7 km and a coarsest value above 5,000 km, so individual points vary enormously in precision. 25 per cent of the country entries derived from this download rest on a single record, and the majority of records are human observations rather than preserved specimens; counts are therefore published alongside every country.

  6. iNaturalist (2026). Psilocybe azurescens — iNaturalist taxon 179652; accessed 29 September 2026. . Source record ↗

    Source class: taxonomic database.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-29 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Taxon record retrieved and confirmed by two independent routes: a name query returned exactly one active species taxon named Psilocybe azurescens with id 179652, and the record endpoint was then fetched directly and agreed on name, rank and active status. This is an identifier for a community observation platform, not a taxonomic authority.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-29 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Taxon record retrieved and confirmed by two independent routes: a name query returned exactly one active species taxon named Psilocybe azurescens with id 179652, and the record endpoint was then fetched directly and agreed on name, rank and active status. This is an identifier for a community observation platform, not a taxonomic authority.

  7. Index Fungorum (2026). Index Fungorum name record 446057: Psilocybe azurescens. . Source record ↗

    Source class: taxonomic database.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Record identity checked. Bibliographic year denotes access, not nomenclatural publication.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Name record read through web retrieval. Name, authorship, publication and current-name assertion checked. For 321950 the year is 1969 [1968]; for 515724 the current name is arcana at species rank. This is a dated database assertion, not independent peer review.

  8. T. Niskanen; B. Dentinger; A.M. Ainsworth; I. Kytövuori; J.T. Kim; G.W. Griffith; K. Liimatainen (2026). Re-shaping the family-level classification of Agaricineae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) using a phylogenomic approach. Studies in Mycology 113(1), 115–134. DOI: 10.3114/sim.2026.113.03 Source record ↗

    Source class: primary.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Bibliographic identity inspected; publication year is distinct from retrieval date.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Family treatment Agrocybaceae, Table 1 and classification discussion inspected in the PDF. Effective online date in paper: 1 April 2026; Crossref issue date differs, so the record retains year only.

    • doi: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      DOI and title matched against the cited bibliographic record; not just resolver availability.

  9. Coleton Windsor; Anna E Kreynes; Jeff S Chilton; William A Chioffi; Christopher Niebergall; Kelsey Dodds (2026). Development of Psilocybe Mushroom Species Reference Material—Cultivation Parameters and Chemical Profiles. Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 109(1), 37–50. DOI: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf007 Source record ↗

    Source class: primary.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Publisher and Crossref title, six authors, DOI, volume and pages agree. Citation uses 2026 issue year; first online publication was 17 February 2025.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      Full publisher HTML inspected. Azurescens Table 3 row, dry weight basis, N(samples), sample preparation, storage and densitometry checked. No cultivation instructions extracted. Qualitative minor-alkaloid bands are not entered as concentrations.

    • doi: verified · 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Verification source

      DOI, title, authors and journal matched to Crossref metadata and the publication.

Claim provenance

Source checks record what was inspected. Publication approval and section review are separate editorial decisions.

Core name and adopted species treatment; full synonymy is not claimed.

Fields: taxonomy.canonical_name, taxonomy.accepted_name, taxonomy.genus, taxonomy.specific_epithet, taxonomy.authority, taxonomy.publication_year, taxonomy.status, taxonomy.index_fungorum_id

Agrocybaceae follows the 2026 family revision.

Fields: taxonomy.family

This account connects the 1995 name with later morphological, molecular and chemical studies. The extracted chemistry concerns cultivated research material.

Fields: overview.text

  • index-fungorum-446057-2026 — Name record

    Source checked · Accessed 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Checked against the cited source by the Psilocybia editorial process.

  • borovicka-2008 — pp. 176–177, 180

    Source checked · Accessed 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Checked against the cited source by the Psilocybia editorial process.

  • windsor-2026 — Table 3

    Source checked · Accessed 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Checked against the cited source by the Psilocybia editorial process.

Borovička’s treatment records caps 3–6(–10) cm across, usually with a pointed umbo, and stems reaching 20 cm. A fibrous ring zone can occur on the upper stem. These are published taxonomic characters.

Fields: description.macroscopic.text

  • borovicka-2008 — Key pp. 176–177

    Source checked · Accessed 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Checked against the cited source by the Psilocybia editorial process.

The same treatment gives ellipsoid spores measuring (11.0–)12.0–13.5(–14.8) × (6.8–)7.2–7.7(–8.0) µm. The bracketed endpoints represent the 5th and 95th percentiles, as defined in the methods.

Fields: description.microscopic.text

Index Fungorum records the type habitat as red-alder wood chips in Oregon. The later genome paper describes its California source material as soil beneath redwood leaf litter. These are separate collection contexts.

Fields: ecology.narrative.text

Published molecular material includes Oregon voucher PRM 901020 and an East San Francisco Bay collection in the genome study. These records are not a complete range map; laboratory material in the chemistry study adds no wild locality.

Fields: distribution.narrative.text

Table 1 of the 2011 study links PRM 901020 to ITS GU565173, LSU GU565166 and EF1α GU565159. The later genome paper reports GCA_040207365.1 and BioSample SAMN39911973.

Fields: molecular.text

  • borovicka-2011 — Table 1 p. 151

    Source checked · Accessed 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Checked against the cited source by the Psilocybia editorial process.

  • bollinger-2025 — Table 1, azurescens column

    Source checked · Accessed 2026-09-10 · Psilocybia editorial. Checked against the cited source by the Psilocybia editorial process.

Index Fungorum cites the name in Integration 6: 21 (1995) and records the holotype as a Stamets collection of 21 November 1993 at WTU. The original 1995 publication has not been inspected for this account.

Fields: history.text

One HPTLC study is extracted. It reports concentrations as percent dry weight and counts 12 samples; these are not assumed to be 12 independent wild collections.

Fields: chemistry.summary.text, chemistry.evidence_status

Psilocybin and psilocin were quantified by HPTLC densitometry at 273 nm. Other alkaloids were examined qualitatively, without concentration values in Table 3.

Fields: chemistry.modern_assay.text

Table 3 ranges, sample count and method context retained.

Fields: chemistry.assays.0

544 georeferenced records for this name in the cited GBIF download, plotted as 217 distinct positions and spanning 11 country codes, of which 4 rest on a single record. These are record locations, not a compiled range: no range has been researched for this account.

Fields: distribution.occurrence

Database identifiers for this species, recorded so a reader can retrieve the same records. The GBIF backbone still places Psilocybe in Hymenogastraceae, whereas this site follows the 2026 family revision and treats the genus in Agrocybaceae; citing the identifier is not an endorsement of that placement.

Fields: distribution.gbif_taxon_id, distribution.inaturalist_taxon_id

Distribution as given in the 2008 revision, which reports it as an American species introduced to Europe and attributes the European occurrence to recent amateur outdoor cultivation. That paper gives no phenology beyond noting it is probably similar to P. cyanescens, so seasonality is left unfilled rather than published as a hedge.

Fields: distribution.regions, distribution.countries