An independent scientific referenceTaxonomy · Evidence · Context
PSILOCYBIAA monograph for the digital age.
Research edition Accounts distinguish agent source checks from human review. Research coverage is incomplete. Read our standards

Psilocybia / The Index / Species record

The Psilocybe Index / Species account

Psilocybe cabiensis

Guzmán, M. Torres & Ram.-Guill.

Taxonomy: acceptedChemistry: Not yet researchedMolecular data: Not yet researched

Scoped account prepared by Codex; no human scientific review. Macroscopic descriptions, chemical literature, conservation, licensed scientific imagery and occurrence datasets remain unresearched. Original protologues and exhaustive synonymy remain incomplete. Type observations and study localities are not complete species descriptions or range maps.

01Overview

Agent source-checked

This Colombian account centres on the 2013 re-examination of type material. It documents selected microscopic features and the collection provenance, while chemical evidence and broader ecology remain unresearched. [ramirez-cruz-2013-types]

This is a scientific reference record, not field-identification guidance.

02Nomenclature

Accepted name
Psilocybe cabiensis
Authority
Guzmán, M. Torres & Ram.-Guill.
Family
Agrocybaceae
Publication year
2004
Basionym
Not yet researched — verification required
Taxonomic status
accepted
MycoBank identifier
Not yet researched — verification required
Index Fungorum identifier
Not yet researched — verification required
Synonyms (0 recorded names)

No verified synonyms entered. This does not indicate that synonyms do not exist.

Nomenclatural sources: [colfungi-370729-2026] [ramirez-cruz-2013-types] [niskanen-2026]

Research completeness

taxonomy
Agent source-checked — Codex (agent), 2026-09-12

Name and acceptance checked in the Kew Colombian Fungi record and 2013 type revision. Family discrepancy explicitly resolved using the 2026 primary treatment. Direct Index Fungorum retrieval and original protologue remain incomplete; its identifier is not populated from an uninspected name record.

overview
preliminary

Selected source passages checked; this is not a comprehensive account.

description
preliminary

Selected microscopic observations from the type revision checked against PDF page images. Macroscopic description remains unresearched. Numeric units are read from the page images, not the unreliable extracted text.

ecology
not researched

Not yet researched for this account; no claim that evidence is absent.

distribution
preliminary

Selected source passages checked; this is not a comprehensive account.

chemistry
not researched

Not yet researched for this account; no claim that evidence is absent.

molecular
not researched

Not yet researched for this account; no claim that evidence is absent.

history
preliminary

Selected source passages checked; this is not a comprehensive account.

conservation
not researched

Not yet researched for this account; no claim that evidence is absent.

03Taxonomic description

Taxonomic description. These characters are presented for scientific reference and are not intended as field-identification guidance.

Macroscopic characters

Not yet researched

This section has not yet been researched for this account.

Microscopic characters

Agent source-checked

The examined material has reported spores of 5.6–7.2(8.0) × 4.0–4.8 × 3.2–4.4 µm. The revision records pileocystidia embedded in the ixocutis, a ramose subhymenium and setaceous hyphae in the basal mycelium. These are selected observations from the specimen labelled an isotype in the paper. [ramirez-cruz-2013-types]

04Distribution and ecology

Agent source-checked

The revision lists G. Guzmán 35331 (XAL, isotype), collected on 24 September 2002 at Pacurita, southeast of Quibdó in Chocó, Colombia. This locality is specimen provenance; it does not delimit the species’ range. [ramirez-cruz-2013-types]

Known range
Not yet researched
Habitats
Not yet researched
Substrates
Not yet researched
Ecological associations
Not yet researched
Seasonality
Not yet researched

Ecological context

Not yet researched

This section has not yet been researched for this account.

Occurrence records

Occurrence map — awaiting verified records

No occurrence points loaded.

Recorded observations are not equivalent to true biological range. Absence of records does not demonstrate absence of a species.

Occurrence provenance & future map methods
Source
Not yet supplied
Licence / retrieval date
Awaiting licence / Not retrieved
Coordinate uncertainty
Not reviewed
Sensitive records
unreviewed

Future ingestion will review licensing, coordinate uncertainty and sensitive locations. Sampling, clustering and date filters will operate on separately loaded datasets; no coordinates are embedded in this page.

05Chemistry

Measurements belong to studies, specimens and methods. A single concentration cannot stand in for a species.

Published assays · Measurements retain their original methodological context.
Study / yearMaterialMethodRecord
No verified assay records entered. This does not establish that no published assays exist.
Fields retained in each future assay record

Study, publication year, specimen, material, sample size, provenance, analytical method, preparation, storage, psilocybin, psilocin, baeocystin, norbaeocystin, aeruginascin, units, qualifiers and methodological notes. No concentrations have been invented for this prototype.

Modern quantitative assays

Not yet researched

Modern analytical studies have not yet been systematically searched and checked for this account.

Evidence assessment

Not yet researched

Chemical literature has not yet been reviewed for this account. No assay values are extracted; this does not establish the presence or absence of any compound.

Assessments depend on material, preparation, storage, sampling and analytical methods. Measurements are literature records, not predictions of effects.

How chemistry records are structured ↗

06Molecular evidence

Not yet researched

This section has not yet been researched for this account.

07History

Agent source-checked

The name is attributed to Guzmán, M. Torres and Ramírez-Guillén, published in International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 6(1):86 (2004). The 2013 type revision adds microscopic observations. The original description has not been inspected for this account. [colfungi-370729-2026] [ramirez-cruz-2013-types]

A place for the historical record

This account records the nomenclatural history checked so far. Broader historical research remains pending; interpretations must stay connected to their documentary sources.

Reading the scientific record ↗

08Conservation

Not yet researched

This section has not yet been researched for this account.

Assessment status
Not yet researched
Assessment authority / year
Not verified / Not verified

Not researched by Psilocybia, not assessed by a conservation authority, and Least Concern are different states. None should be inferred from another.

09Images & specimens

No verified, licensed scientific images supplied

Space is reserved for field photographs, herbarium specimens, microscopy and historical plates, with source and licence metadata.

Photographs are not presented as sufficient for mushroom identification.

10References

  1. T. Niskanen; B. Dentinger; A.M. Ainsworth; I. Kytövuori; J.T. Kim; G.W. Griffith; K. Liimatainen (2026). Re-shaping the family-level classification of Agaricineae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) using a phylogenomic approach. Studies in Mycology 113(1), 115–134. DOI: 10.3114/sim.2026.113.03 Source record ↗

    Source class: primary.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-10 · Codex (agent) (agent). Verification source

      Bibliographic identity inspected; publication year is distinct from retrieval date.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-10 · Codex (agent) (agent). Verification source

      Family treatment Agrocybaceae, Table 1 and classification discussion inspected in the PDF. Effective online date in paper: 1 April 2026; Crossref issue date differs, so the record retains year only.

    • doi: verified · 2026-09-10 · Codex (agent) (agent). Verification source

      DOI and title matched against the cited bibliographic record; not just resolver availability.

  2. Virginia Ramírez-Cruz; Gaston Guzmán; Laura Guzmán-Dávalos (2013). Type studies of Psilocybe sensu lato (Strophariaceae, Agaricales). Sydowia 65(2), 277–319. Source record ↗

    Source class: primary.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-10 · Codex (agent) (agent). Verification source

      Bibliographic identity checked against the publication.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-10 · Codex (agent) (agent). Verification source

      Full PDF inspected, with goniospora pp. 291–292 and ovoideocystidiata pp. 302–303 read in detail. No numeric microdimensions transcribed because extracted unit glyphs are unreliable. Qualitative cystidial observations and the type voucher are used.

  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew / Colombian Fungi made accessible (2026). Psilocybe cabiensis, name record 370729 — accessed 12 September 2026. . Source record ↗

    Source class: taxonomic database.

    Source verification history
    • metadata: verified · 2026-09-12 · Codex (agent) (agent). Verification source

      Provider, record identity and displayed nomenclatural citation checked. Retrieval year is not the name publication year.

    • content: verified · 2026-09-12 · Codex (agent) (agent). Verification source

      Read accepted name, authority, original publication citation and Colombian distribution. The older family placement Hymenogastraceae is retained as a competing source assertion, superseded editorially by Niskanen et al. (2026).

Claim provenance

Source checks record what was inspected. Publication approval and section review are separate editorial decisions.

The name and nomenclatural citation agree between the inspected database record and the type revision.

Fields: taxonomy.canonical_name, taxonomy.accepted_name, taxonomy.genus, taxonomy.specific_epithet, taxonomy.authority, taxonomy.publication_year

Retain the species following the inspected type treatment, corroborated by current database acceptance; this is a scoped editorial decision, not a genus-wide reconciliation.

Fields: taxonomy.status

Adopt Agrocybaceae following the 2026 phylogenomic family treatment, which explicitly includes Psilocybe.

Fields: taxonomy.family

The Colombian Fungi database places the species in Hymenogastraceae.

Fields: taxonomy.family

This Colombian account centres on the 2013 re-examination of type material. It documents selected microscopic features and the collection provenance, while chemical evidence and broader ecology remain unresearched.

Fields: overview.text

The examined material has reported spores of 5.6–7.2(8.0) × 4.0–4.8 × 3.2–4.4 µm. The revision records pileocystidia embedded in the ixocutis, a ramose subhymenium and setaceous hyphae in the basal mycelium. These are selected observations from the specimen labelled an isotype in the paper.

Fields: description.microscopic.text

The revision lists G. Guzmán 35331 (XAL, isotype), collected on 24 September 2002 at Pacurita, southeast of Quibdó in Chocó, Colombia. This locality is specimen provenance; it does not delimit the species’ range.

Fields: distribution.narrative.text

The name is attributed to Guzmán, M. Torres and Ramírez-Guillén, published in International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 6(1):86 (2004). The 2013 type revision adds microscopic observations. The original description has not been inspected for this account.

Fields: history.text

Conflicting evidence

Resolved: taxonomy.family

The database uses an older family placement than the 2026 phylogenomic treatment.

Follow Niskanen et al. (2026), which explicitly includes Psilocybe in Agrocybaceae. The database supports the name and acceptance, not the family adopted here. — Codex (agent), 2026-09-12