An independent scientific referenceTaxonomy · Evidence · Context
PSILOCYBIAA monograph for the digital age.
Research edition Accounts distinguish agent source checks from human review. Research coverage is incomplete. Read our standards
Research coverage of 25 records. This is editorial progress, not a survey of the genus.
SpeciesTaxonomyDescriptionMolecular dataOccurrencesChemical analysisModern assayConservation
Psilocybe alleniiSSSSS
Psilocybe azurescensSSSSS
Psilocybe cabiensisS
Psilocybe caerulescensSSSS
Psilocybe caerulipesSSSS
Psilocybe cubensisSSSSS
Psilocybe cyanescensSSSSS
Psilocybe eximiaS?
Psilocybe fuscofulvaSSSS
Psilocybe hispanicaS?
Psilocybe keralensisS
Psilocybe liniformansSSS
Psilocybe magnisporaS
Psilocybe medullosaSSSSS
Psilocybe meridionalisS
Psilocybe mescaleroensisSS
Psilocybe mexicanaSSSSS
Psilocybe ovoideocystidiataSSSSS
Psilocybe samuiensisSS
Psilocybe semilanceataSSSSS
Psilocybe serbicaSSSSS
Psilocybe subtropicalisS
Psilocybe wayanadensisS
Psilocybe yungensisSSS
Psilocybe zapotecorumSSS?S

○ Not yet researched by Psilocybia   S Agent source-checked   ✓ Human reviewed   ? See record for uncertainty or missing evidence. An empty research record does not mean evidence is absent.

This matrix reports the scope of work completed within Psilocybia. Agent source checks are distinct from human review and do not establish exhaustive coverage of the scientific literature. Verified sources and an explicit review method are required before genus-wide conclusions can be drawn.

Evidence and editorial standards ↗