An independent scientific referenceTaxonomy · Evidence · Context
PSILOCYBIAA monograph for the digital age.
Research edition Accounts distinguish source checks from human review. Research coverage is incomplete. Read our standards
Research coverage of 25 records. This is editorial progress, not a survey of the genus.
SpeciesTaxonomyDescriptionMolecular dataOccurrencesChemical analysisModern assayConservation
Psilocybe allenii✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe azurescens✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe cabiensis✓○○?○○○
Psilocybe caerulescens✓○SSSS○
Psilocybe caerulipes✓○SSSS○
Psilocybe cubensis✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe cyanescens✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe eximia✓?○?○○○
Psilocybe fuscofulva✓○SSSS○
Psilocybe hispanica✓○?S○○○
Psilocybe keralensis✓○○S○○○
Psilocybe liniformans✓S○SS○○
Psilocybe magnispora✓○○S○○○
Psilocybe medullosa✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe meridionalis✓○○S○○○
Psilocybe mescaleroensis✓S○S○○○
Psilocybe mexicana✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe ovoideocystidiata✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe samuiensis✓S○S○○○
Psilocybe semilanceata✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe serbica✓SSSSS○
Psilocybe subtropicalis✓○○S○○○
Psilocybe wayanadensis✓○○S○○○
Psilocybe yungensis✓SSS○○○
Psilocybe zapotecorum✓SSS?S○

○ Not yet researched by Psilocybia   S Source-checked   ✓ Human reviewed   ? See record for uncertainty or missing evidence. An empty research record does not mean evidence is absent.

This matrix reports the scope of work completed within Psilocybia. Source checks are recorded separately from editorial review, and neither establishes exhaustive coverage of the scientific literature. Verified sources and an explicit review method are required before genus-wide conclusions can be drawn.

Evidence and editorial standards ↗